<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schering-Plough and Company X?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.com/urge-to-merge/schering-plough-and-company-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.com/urge-to-merge/schering-plough-and-company-x/</link>
	<description>Morningstar&#039;s guide to what&#039;s hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Leder</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/urge-to-merge/schering-plough-and-company-x/comment-page-1/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Leder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=3748#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Condor. For footnoted readers, here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a link&lt;/a&gt; to Condor&#039;s interesting site on all things Schering-Plough. One of the things I didn&#039;t get around to talking about in this post was all the money top Schering officials get post-merger, but Condor has all of those details &lt;a href=&quot;http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/05/if-carrie-cox-is-let-go-shortly-after.html rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-wall-street-journal-and-most.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Condor. For footnoted readers, here&#8217;s <a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/ rel="nofollow">a link</a> to Condor&#8217;s interesting site on all things Schering-Plough. One of the things I didn&#8217;t get around to talking about in this post was all the money top Schering officials get post-merger, but Condor has all of those details <a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/05/if-carrie-cox-is-let-go-shortly-after.html rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://shearlingsplowed.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-wall-street-journal-and-most.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condor</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/urge-to-merge/schering-plough-and-company-x/comment-page-1/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>Condor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=3748#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>I ran a poll, on mine, on this -- but by 5 pm EDT on May 21, 2009, the usual &quot;people familiar with the matter&quot; had anonymously confirmed to the Wall Street Journal that Company X was Johnson &amp; Johnson.  I had run a piece in the early afternoon, making the inferential argument that it was none other than JNJ, by the confirmation from the WSJ sealed the deal.

Namaste -- great site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran a poll, on mine, on this &#8212; but by 5 pm EDT on May 21, 2009, the usual &#8220;people familiar with the matter&#8221; had anonymously confirmed to the Wall Street Journal that Company X was Johnson &amp; Johnson.  I had run a piece in the early afternoon, making the inferential argument that it was none other than JNJ, by the confirmation from the WSJ sealed the deal.</p>
<p>Namaste &#8212; great site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

