More than one way to skin a company…
Insiders at Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS) have certainly found plenty of ways to plunder the company coffers. Our first insight into this family free-for-all came in the recent 8-K that the Company filed to announce the appointment of former CEO Steven Lund to the Board. In the filing, the Company disclosed that it
leases corporate offices, a distribution center, and certain other property pursuant to lease agreements with two entities, Scrub Oak, Ltd. and Aspen Country LLC, which are owned by Steven J. Lund and the following executive officers and directors of the Company and respective family members: Blake M. Roney, Sandra N. Tillotson, and Brooke B. Roney. In 2005, the Company incurred lease charges totaling approximately $2.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively, to Scrub Oak and Aspen Country.
Those are some hefty lease payments going to related parties. Makes you wonder what other pots the Nu Skin crew have their fingers in. Quite a few, according to the Company’s most recent proxy
- We periodically charter air service from a charter company, Keystone Aviation LLC, in which Blake M. Roney, our Chairman of the Board, currently owns a 51% interest. In 2005, we paid $850,336 to this charter company."
- Jose Ferreira, Jr., a director of our company, was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Woodclyffe Group, LLC until October 2005, which performed consulting work for us for a monthly retainer of $22,500 plus a daily rate per consultant for time above the contractual commitment. A total of $191,072.51 was paid for services provided by the Woodclyffe Group in 2005."
- "We currently employ two brothers and two brothers-in-law of Blake M. Roney, who each make in excess of $60,000 per year. One of Mr. Roney’s brothers, Brooke Roney, currently serves as a senior corporate officer and his compensation for 2005 (consisting of salary, bonuses, perquisites and tax-gross-ups) totaled $584,834. We paid the other relatives of Mr. Roney an aggregate of $363,205 in salary and bonuses for 2005."
- "We pay commissions to, as independent contractors or distributors, two sons-in-law of Sandie Tillotson, who each make in excess of $60,000 per year. We paid one of these individuals an aggregate of $743,394 and the other individual an aggregate of $164,676 in commissions in 2005."
Finally, the pièce de résistance: "During 2005, certain of our employees provided various personal services for Blake M. Roney, his brother Brooke Roney, Sandie Tillotson, and various entities owned by these individuals. The personal services included the provision of tax, financial, maintenance, courier and various other services."
Insiders come up with creative ways to fatten their wallets and get their employees to count their money for them? Sounds like Nu Skin shareholders are getting skinned alive.
Advertisement
|
Posted in |
7 Comments » |


7 Comments »
September 14th, 2006 at 12:00 pm
Love your site, keep up the good work.
Andrey at stockforlife.blogspot.com
September 14th, 2006 at 7:14 pm
Just like any other group of individuals who founded a successful company, then took it public, the original founding group is still in control to a great degree. Some of the facts stated above sound bad but when taken in context are no worse than any other tax-efficient group of people’s efforts.
I don’t actually see the relevance, for just one quick example, of…
“We pay commissions to, as independent contractors or distributors, two sons-in-law of Sandie Tillotson, who each make in excess of $60,000 per year. We paid one of these individuals an aggregate of $743,394 and the other individual an aggregate of $164,676 in commissions in 2005.”
…to your point and ‘angle’.
They are paid commission on merit, based purely on revenue they have brought to the company. I see no problem whatsoever with that as they are doing exactly the same work as other independent contractors who work as Nu Skin Enterprises Distributors, many of whom earn far greater amounts.
Poor reporting in my opinion.
September 14th, 2006 at 8:45 pm
Is it equally poor reporting to point out that your site very clearly says that it is an initiative of Nu-Skin? I seem to have missed that point in your comments.
You are, of course, welcome to your opinion. But the point is that companies with long laundry lists of related party transactions tend to underperform — not always, but usually.
September 14th, 2006 at 9:19 pm
Hear hear Michelle. Thanks for the disclaimer on the previous poster.
September 18th, 2006 at 8:31 am
I guess the relevance is related to conflicts of interest, and how having personal ties to some businesses can lead you to make business decisions that may not be based on pure economics. Apparently this company has plenty of room for conflicts of interest.
September 18th, 2006 at 3:14 pm
Chris J needs to clean his rose colored glasses. Brooke Roney, the corporate officer to whom we paid $584,000 plans the annual corporate golf tournament. He has no other daily corporate responsibilities.
September 19th, 2006 at 3:29 pm
“Nu Skin Employee” must be a lie. Any real employee would know that you are talking about DEREK Roney, NOT Brooke Roney! Derek makes less money than that, but you’re pretty much right about his job…