<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many pairs of sunglasses do you own?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/</link>
	<description>Morningstar&#039;s guide to what&#039;s hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-8992</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=4049#comment-8992</guid>
		<description>My wife and I each have two pair of sunglasses. Although the screenshot of the graph does state &quot;consumers&quot;, is it possible they meant people who purchase sunglasses and not &quot;all people&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I each have two pair of sunglasses. Although the screenshot of the graph does state &#8220;consumers&#8221;, is it possible they meant people who purchase sunglasses and not &#8220;all people&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSR</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-8988</link>
		<dc:creator>OSR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=4049#comment-8988</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve had a girlfriend in the last decade that didn&#039;t have at least 3 pairs of shades. Some people use them as fashion accessories, so it makes sense. Or at least as much sense as having 30 pairs of shoes and one pair of feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve had a girlfriend in the last decade that didn&#8217;t have at least 3 pairs of shades. Some people use them as fashion accessories, so it makes sense. Or at least as much sense as having 30 pairs of shoes and one pair of feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-8986</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=4049#comment-8986</guid>
		<description>I have about 5 or 6 with about 4 of them in a normal &quot;rotation&quot; depending upon the mood or what I am doing (going to lunch, playing sports, on the water/beach, etc...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have about 5 or 6 with about 4 of them in a normal &#8220;rotation&#8221; depending upon the mood or what I am doing (going to lunch, playing sports, on the water/beach, etc&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/on-the-lighter-side/how-many-pairs-of-sunglasses-do-you-own/comment-page-1/#comment-8974</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=4049#comment-8974</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got about 6-7 with some being snap-ons.   Just an artist thing.
Hey nice blog addition.   &quot;substantial doubts&quot; is right up there with closely related, 
dreaded &quot;going concern&quot;.  Good chart at his July 14 Archive.  Says it all.  As if jobless
increase not a clue.  Where the heck is the promised relief voted for?  Oh forgot 
must not criticize, that&#039;s such a Bush era thing.

Below is a chart of total EDGAR filings in June. Filings are off 15% year over year and off 24% from the high in 2006. In a way, Filings = Business Activity + Regulations. We have not seen a decline in regulations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got about 6-7 with some being snap-ons.   Just an artist thing.<br />
Hey nice blog addition.   &#8220;substantial doubts&#8221; is right up there with closely related,<br />
dreaded &#8220;going concern&#8221;.  Good chart at his July 14 Archive.  Says it all.  As if jobless<br />
increase not a clue.  Where the heck is the promised relief voted for?  Oh forgot<br />
must not criticize, that&#8217;s such a Bush era thing.</p>
<p>Below is a chart of total EDGAR filings in June. Filings are off 15% year over year and off 24% from the high in 2006. In a way, Filings = Business Activity + Regulations. We have not seen a decline in regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

