<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The mystery in Forestar&#8217;s annual report&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.com/odds-and-ends/the-mystery-in-forestars-annual-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.com/odds-and-ends/the-mystery-in-forestars-annual-report/</link>
	<description>Morningstar&#039;s guide to what&#039;s hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/odds-and-ends/the-mystery-in-forestars-annual-report/comment-page-1/#comment-11991</link>
		<dc:creator>F Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=4571#comment-11991</guid>
		<description>fwiw  Insider sells vs buys past 6 months was 18:10 trade ratio. 
Amounts 174K:237K
No real smoking gun in the volume amounts.  Bit heavy on trade side.
Those Texans do like their planes. Tightly held with 91% institutions.
Funda seem ok but cash flow &amp; bal sheet fallen sharply since high price of $29 in
2007.  Not much interest in it lately which is odd given their natural resource holdings
while nat commods have run up.
Wouldn&#039;t mess with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fwiw  Insider sells vs buys past 6 months was 18:10 trade ratio.<br />
Amounts 174K:237K<br />
No real smoking gun in the volume amounts.  Bit heavy on trade side.<br />
Those Texans do like their planes. Tightly held with 91% institutions.<br />
Funda seem ok but cash flow &amp; bal sheet fallen sharply since high price of $29 in<br />
2007.  Not much interest in it lately which is odd given their natural resource holdings<br />
while nat commods have run up.<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t mess with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

