Digging into Xerox’s 10-K…
Today’s the deadline for the many companies that are on a calendar year to get their 10Ks in to the SEC, and the folks here at footnoted couldn’t be happier. We won’t bore you with how we spent our respective weekends combing through over 900 alerts to assemble a hefty spreadsheet of all the different things that companies tried to dump in these filings, some of which topped over 1,600 pages! We’ll be sharing our best finds with subscribers to FootnotedPro.
But we thought the 10-K filed by Xerox (XRX) late Friday was a good one to talk about here for several reasons. For one, we’ve been pretty skeptical about the recently approved acquisition of Affiliated Computer Services (old ticker: ACS), which Xerox promises will expand its reach in the business process and document management markets. Yet, there is some positive news. For example, Xerox obtained 16% more patents in 2009 than in 2008. And this article points out that Xerox reported a 4Q 2009 profit of $180 million (although it adds that “the improvement was driven entirely by [its] success in paring its costs”).
If you look deeper, though, you might just end up with that annoyed feeling you get when the photocopier jams, you get toner all over your hands, and you still can’t find the crumpled paper that’s supposedly hiding in “Section B” of the machine.
The biggest annoyance comes from page 29. Here’s a snippet from the paragraph about the Annual Performance Incentive Plan, or “APIP”:
The Compensation Committee approved the payments of cash awards under the Xerox 2004 Performance Incentive Plan (“2004 PIP”), as amended, for the second half of 2009 APIP. The Compensation Committee had previously approved the awards for the first half of 2009 at its July 2009 meeting…. The Compensation Committee approved a second half 2009 cash award of $1,181,250 to [CEO Ursula] Burns, $1,093,750 to [Chairman of the Board Anne] Mulcahy, $624,750 to [Vice Chairman/CFO Lawrence] Zimmerman, $624,750 to [EVP & President, Corp. Operations James] Firestone, and $491,417 to [Sr. VP & President, Developing Markets Operations Jean-Noel] Machon. These awards, combined with previously approved cash awards for the first half of 2009, result in combined cash awards of $1,884,375 to Ms. Burns, $2,331,250 to Mrs. Mulcahy, $1,071,000 to Mr. Zimmerman, $1,071,000 to Mr. Firestone, and $842,428 to Mr. Machon for full fiscal 2009.
Although the company “explains” the awards by referring to this exhibit, handing out millions of dollars seems inconsistent when viewed in the context of what else is going on. For example, we’re guessing that those types of bonuses won’t sit too well with the 2,500 folks that Xerox plans to lay off.
This article points out that Xerox – which is trying “to reverse five straight quarters of sales declines” – bought Affiliated Computer Services to help boost its revenues. And this report stated that after the ACS acquisition, S&P lowered Xerox’s ratings to BBB-, one notch above junk status. It also cited an analyst who said that Xerox is “vulnerable to macroeconomic conditions, as demonstrated by the sharp drop in equipment sales in 2009.”
But what about the fact that the stock is trading about 80 percent higher than it sold for one year ago? Well, that might seem less impressive after looking at p. 27 of the annual report, where Xerox includes a graph that shows what a $100 investment made on December 31, 2004 would be worth five years later. A hundred dollars invested in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index would have been worth $117.11. A hundred dollars invested in the S&P 500 Index would have been worth $102.11. And a hundred dollars in Xerox? Five years later, it would have been worth $51.97.
Image source: Xerox
|
Posted in Tags: 10-Ks, Friday filings |
5 Comments » |


5 Comments »
RSS
March 1st, 2010 at 5:03 pm
I think Mulcahy and Burns have been at XRX since 12/31/04. If the 5 year value of an investment in XRX stock is less than the value of the Information Technology Index and the S&P 500 Index, why oh why are they getting a bonus!!! XRX shareholders, rise up and unite in opposition!
March 9th, 2010 at 7:57 am
Totally unacceptable. Burns is also outsoucing most of the R&D engineering work to India yet she goes to Washington, DC to talk with representatives of the Obama administration on how to create more jobs for US workers, how hypacritical is that? After 42 years with the company, I will probably one of the 2500 laid of workers. Thanks for all your years of service
March 16th, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Hey Harold,
You forgot to mention that they recently cut our severance in half. Add to that, I haven’t had a raise in three years. AND, the three years prior to that, they were all one percent. A three percent increase over 6 years.
Enjoy your bonuses… I’m living on Top Ramen.
March 20th, 2010 at 3:59 pm
How do they sleep at night. I was let go during the Xerox January 15, 2009 IRIF, after 36 1/2 years – with only 4 years to go to reach full retirment benefits. It’s such a shame that they can approve million doller bonuses for themselves and watch long time, loyal employees be walked out the door. I’m sure Joe Wilson is rolling over in his grave. Shame on Xerox — what happend to the Corporate Values you proclaimed for years ?? We’ll never see the old Xerox again, but at the rate their going, I’m wondering how long it’ll be before there’s no Xerox at all !!
March 24th, 2010 at 5:55 pm
Don’t forget the profit to be shown by ending health benefits to retired employees. The irony: In the golden age of Xerox, CEO compensation was about 40 times the income of the average worker. Now, it is somewhere over 300%. Does that mean that that those bonuses could pay the way of 80 or more productive workers each? And doesn’t the company lose productive capacity when reductions happen? Maybe, someone with a sharp pencil shows a productivity gain by using inventoried stock divided by downsized workforce to equal a stupendous productivity. Problem is, it can’t be done over and over.