<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just add water (and hot air)&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.com/market-meltdown/just-add-water-and-hot-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.com/market-meltdown/just-add-water-and-hot-air/</link>
	<description>Morningstar&#039;s guide to what&#039;s hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:16:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/market-meltdown/just-add-water-and-hot-air/comment-page-1/#comment-6424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/?p=2729#comment-6424</guid>
		<description>I have found a couple of passages in the bailout bill that make it look like this structured as a revolving credit facility that never has to get paid back and is really only limited by the cap on the National debt.  

For example in Sec 115: GRADUATED AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE, it does not say that Paulson can buy $700 Billion of assets, it says that the &quot;authority shall be limited to $700 Billion outstanding at any one time.&quot;  So for example if He decided to buy $700 billion of assets, then he sold those assets for a loss, he would no longer be holding any assets, right?  So, would he then be able to buy up another $700 billion of assets, sell them at a loss and keep paying for the shortfall by having the FED issue more debt?  If so, then isn&#039;t he really only limited by the Cap on the national debt?

Please tell me I am missing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found a couple of passages in the bailout bill that make it look like this structured as a revolving credit facility that never has to get paid back and is really only limited by the cap on the National debt.  </p>
<p>For example in Sec 115: GRADUATED AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE, it does not say that Paulson can buy $700 Billion of assets, it says that the &#8220;authority shall be limited to $700 Billion outstanding at any one time.&#8221;  So for example if He decided to buy $700 billion of assets, then he sold those assets for a loss, he would no longer be holding any assets, right?  So, would he then be able to buy up another $700 billion of assets, sell them at a loss and keep paying for the shortfall by having the FED issue more debt?  If so, then isn&#8217;t he really only limited by the Cap on the national debt?</p>
<p>Please tell me I am missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

