<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not such a pretty picture&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.footnoted.com/gold-stars/not-such-a-pretty-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.footnoted.com/gold-stars/not-such-a-pretty-picture/</link>
	<description>Michelle Leder&#039;s guide to what&#039;s hiding in SEC filings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/gold-stars/not-such-a-pretty-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-2938</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 05:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/blog-reel/not-such-a-pretty-picture/#comment-2938</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with muckdog. It is quite amazing how companies can play the market the way they have been, underpromising then beating earnings and having their stock take off. It is amazing that more investors don&#039;t see through this practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with muckdog. It is quite amazing how companies can play the market the way they have been, underpromising then beating earnings and having their stock take off. It is amazing that more investors don&#8217;t see through this practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muckdog</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/gold-stars/not-such-a-pretty-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-2937</link>
		<dc:creator>muckdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/blog-reel/not-such-a-pretty-picture/#comment-2937</guid>
		<description>Good job.  I think we&#039;re almost expecting some sort of shenanigans when it comes to reporting numbers.  Lots of companies are underpromising and lowering guidance, then beating it by a penny or two in their earnings report.  The stocks soar.  Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job.  I think we&#8217;re almost expecting some sort of shenanigans when it comes to reporting numbers.  Lots of companies are underpromising and lowering guidance, then beating it by a penny or two in their earnings report.  The stocks soar.  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.footnoted.com/gold-stars/not-such-a-pretty-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-2935</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.footnoted.com/blog-reel/not-such-a-pretty-picture/#comment-2935</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice findings.  It&#039;s really important to dig deeply in a time when consumer goods are way out&lt;br /&gt;
of favor.  Trigger happy traders might think, oh here&#039;s the play!  Then the Axe comes down.&lt;br /&gt;
Also of note is 95% institutional ownership.&lt;br /&gt;
So if it does crater SPC could become a REV or&lt;br /&gt;
Sunbeam quickly.  Plus lot of retail brokers don&#039;t allow shorting.

SPC has 95% institutional ownership.  If that mass wants to get out all at once..down comes 
the Axe controlling the trade.
Anyway thanks a lot for covering a sub $5 stock.  They can be real quicksand and one has to learn
to deal with that temptation only to see a REV or Sunbeam occur.  Learned lesson on old BNBN
from Barnes &amp; Nobel.  Took years to get even.  Granted a rare 0.75 makes a recovery but it
must happen quickly like LU, Staples, Corning or Wet Seal.  Otherwise just does R/S or dies.
From Reuters research:
&quot;Because the earnings of SPC are not available, the Price to Sales and Price to Book ratios are the most appropriate valuation measures. Therefore SPC seems valued at a discount with a Price to Sales ratio of 0.121, one of the lowest in the Electronic Instr. &amp; Controls industry, however, their Price to Book is 1.021, below the industry median of 1.88.  &quot;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice findings.  It&#8217;s really important to dig deeply in a time when consumer goods are way out<br />
of favor.  Trigger happy traders might think, oh here&#8217;s the play!  Then the Axe comes down.<br />
Also of note is 95% institutional ownership.<br />
So if it does crater SPC could become a REV or<br />
Sunbeam quickly.  Plus lot of retail brokers don&#8217;t allow shorting.</p>
<p>SPC has 95% institutional ownership.  If that mass wants to get out all at once..down comes<br />
the Axe controlling the trade.<br />
Anyway thanks a lot for covering a sub $5 stock.  They can be real quicksand and one has to learn<br />
to deal with that temptation only to see a REV or Sunbeam occur.  Learned lesson on old BNBN<br />
from Barnes &#038; Nobel.  Took years to get even.  Granted a rare 0.75 makes a recovery but it<br />
must happen quickly like LU, Staples, Corning or Wet Seal.  Otherwise just does R/S or dies.<br />
From Reuters research:<br />
&#8220;Because the earnings of SPC are not available, the Price to Sales and Price to Book ratios are the most appropriate valuation measures. Therefore SPC seems valued at a discount with a Price to Sales ratio of 0.121, one of the lowest in the Electronic Instr. &#038; Controls industry, however, their Price to Book is 1.021, below the industry median of 1.88.  &#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
