A snow-day and Goldman’s 10-K…
It’s snowing here in the northern burbs, which has given me plenty of time to brew some coffee and dig into the 10K that Goldman Sachs (GS) filed yesterday. Weighing in at 691 pages — nearly double the size of last year’s K, it’s certainly a lot to digest and we have to admit getting a bit lost in the extensive risk factors which included all sorts of new warnings on stuff that could potentially go wrong, like the financial markets melting down.
One of the recurring themes in the filing were the problems associated with increased regulation. As Goldman notes (multiple times) it’s now a bank-holding company, which means it’s subject to Federal Reserve rules. But that’s not really the biggest problem, at least according to the K. There’s the prospect, which judging by recent statements by newly confirmed Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and newly confirmed SEC Chair Mary Shapiro seem very real, of regulating the Credit Default Swap market. Here’s how Goldman handles that in the K:
Any regulatory effort to create an exchange or trading platform for credit derivatives and other OTC derivative contracts, or a market shift toward standardized derivatives, could reduce the risk associated with such transactions, but under certain circumstances could also limit our ability to develop derivatives that best suit the needs of our clients and ourselves and adversely affect our profitability.
And, just in case you didn’t get the gist of that entirely, Goldman repeats itself a bit further down:
Recent market disruptions have led to numerous proposals for changes in the regulation of the financial services industry, including significant additional regulation. Regulatory changes could lead to business disruptions, could impact the value of assets that we hold or the scope or profitability of our business activities, could require us to change certain of our business practices and could expose us to additional costs (including compliance costs) and liabilities
There’s plenty of other new warnings too — and some new legal disclosures, like Goldman facing various lawsuits over its underwriting of the now-bankrupt Washington Mutual. There’s also an interesting new disclosure about Goldman facing additional lawsuits from other investors as well as downsized employees because “Our experience has been that legal claims by customers and clients increase in a market downturn. In addition, employment-related claims typically increase in periods when we have reduced the total number of employees.”
So just to recap: regulation is bad, except when it saves us from imploding like Lehman.
This is the last week for the footnoted.org annual survey. Please help us improve in 2009 by taking our annual survey here.
Advertisement
|
Posted in Tags: 10Ks, banks |
3 Comments » |


3 Comments »
January 28th, 2009 at 11:46 am
Figures. Boy there sure are a ton of Lehman grievers now. Where were
they then? Midtown NYC still stunned by the speed of collapse. Lehman
people were very good spenders, Not big on the Yak Yak like what has
been going on lately. Then didn’t need to constantly teach & great.
Just got on with it.
btw new IE 8 RC1 is fast and clean w/ sites. Quick easy install and settings
come right thru. Footnoted.org better than ever. It is for XP and Vista. NOT for the Win 7 unfinished betas. It has its own version.
January 28th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Regulation for regulation’s sake is bad and deprives the free market of developing new products and ways to mitigate risk. Do I think the government has to put guardrails on each side of the road to keep things from straying to far? Yes. Have they done a good job of that to date? No. Do I believe that anything they do to resolve this current crisis with regulation is going to prevent the next market meltdown? No, you only have to realize how many market meltdowns have happened in the past to realize that the great government cannot prevent it from happening again. So regulate the heck out of derivatives if you want, because that’s not what’s going to be the cause the next time the market implodes.
January 29th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
When you see so many financial institutions and even brokerages start going under because of liberal use of credit and lack of adherence to common risk weighted decisions then one can only think that regulation has to be increased. This is akin to the state justice system. A person is granted every freedom until he/she conducts in acts that show their level of decisions making is sub-par. At which case they are put into a situation where they don’t need to use their decision making skills and other will decide what to do for you instead, namely jail.